Template:Did you know nominations/Young v. Facebook, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 18:47, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Young v. Facebook, Inc.

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that in Young v. Facebook, Inc., Judge Jeremy Fogel found that Facebook was not a physical place for the purpose of the Americans with Disabilities Act, "[d]espite its frequent use of terms such as 'posts' and 'walls'"?

Created by Richardchao (talk). Nominated by PacificWonderland (talk) at 06:21, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

• The article is both new enough and long enough, it is within policy and the hook is reliably sourced. I'm not entirely sure that the hook is correctly punctuated with regard to inverted commas. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:31, 4 March 2012 (UTC)