Template:Did you know nominations/Yong Vui Kong v. Public Prosecutor

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by rʨanaɢ (talk) 05:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Yong Vui Kong v. Public Prosecutor

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Supreme Court of Singapore

• ... that in 2010 the Singapore Court of Appeal (pictured) held in Yong Vui Kong v. Public Prosecutor that the mandatory death penalty for drug trafficking does not violate the Constitution?

• Reviewed: Jimmy Jacobs (handballer)

Created/expanded by Debraleong (talk), Shiquank.2010 (talk), Tanjinsong (talk). Nominated by Smuconlaw (talk) at 17:02, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Hook review

Format	Citation	Neutrality	Interest

Article review

Length	Newness	Adequate citations	Formatted citations	Reliable sources	Neutrality	Plagiarism

• Submission was never completed. rʨanaɢ (talk) 05:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)