The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 15:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Overall: @Piotrus: The article was created on 27 August 2023. Its length is 4322 B and both hooks are below 200 characters. All claims in the body of the article have inline citations. I didn't see any unreliable sources. Opinions about the book are attributed to the reviewers and anthropologists who made them. The hooks are supported (I couldn't find the ALT0 quote in the linked Google Books page but it can be found at [1]). Maybe the hooks would be better with less information, for example, by dropping the expressions "1968 bestselling anthropological" and "1968 bestselling and controversial anthropological" but this is optional. WP:EARWIG shows no problems with copyright violations or plagiarism. QPQ was done. Phlsph7 (talk) 12:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
@Piotrus: The article was created on 27 August 2023. Its length is 4322 B and both hooks are below 200 characters. All claims in the body of the article have inline citations. I didn't see any unreliable sources. Opinions about the book are attributed to the reviewers and anthropologists who made them. The hooks are supported (I couldn't find the ALT0 quote in the linked Google Books page but it can be found at [1]). Maybe the hooks would be better with less information, for example, by dropping the expressions "1968 bestselling anthropological" and "1968 bestselling and controversial anthropological" but this is optional. WP:EARWIG shows no problems with copyright violations or plagiarism. QPQ was done. Phlsph7 (talk) 12:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)