The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 12:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Overall: Article checks all the categories to qualify it for DYK, both hooks are interesting and cited, and the qpq has been performed. Overall, I see no reason not to approve this DYK. JJonahJackalope (talk) 14:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)