The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelidtalk 01:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
... that the scenic fields of northern wyethia found in the western United States are sometimes a sign that an area has been overgrazed? Source: [1][2]
ALT1: ... that though northern mule ears is a modest sized wildflower its taproot can reach 1.8 meters (6 feet) into the ground? Source: [3]
ALT2: ... that the scenic fields of northern mule ears found in the western United States are sometimes a sign that an area has been overgrazed? Source: [1][2]
Overall: Everything is good, but I don't think that the addition of both the generic and scientific name is neccessary, and it creates unnecessary clutter/adds length. The same thing could be accomplished by simply dropping the scientific name entirely. Also, I would only recommend that the image be used if the main nom goes through and not ALT1. Cessaune[talk] 02:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
@Cessaune: Changed to put in just the common name, but used the common name "northern weythia" for the main hook. Put in "northern mule ears" as ALT2. Which of the three do you think is most catchy? Thanks for the ping Z1720, I had let this one slide when I went on vacation. I had an amazing time (four weeks in Berlin), but some projects did rather slip through my hands. Thanks for patience and help from everyone. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 17:22, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
I like the main one. Cessaune[talk] 15:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
@Cessaune: Are you ready to approve this? If so, please add the green tick. If not, please list your concerns below. Z1720 (talk) 19:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)