Template:Did you know nominations/World of Commodore
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 12:18, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
World of Commodore
[edit]- ... that following Commodore's demise, the Toronto PET Users Group revived the successful World of Commodore computer expos, which continue to this day?
Created by Psychonaut (talk). Self nominated at 14:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC).
- The article is new, created on Dec 26 (or 27, depending on the time zone), obviously large enough with 10,000+ characters of prose. The hook is properly formed, short enough, and reasonably interesting. Inline referencing is used throughout, and there are no unreferenced paragraphs, but there are some bare URLs that need to be fixed per WP:DYKSG D3. There are also three {{cn}} tags, but I don't think this contravenes any of the DYK rules, as well as WP:MINREF, so I don't see a problem there. Will continue the review by tomorrow hopefully. GregorB (talk) 21:01, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, GregorB. I've filled in the references for the two bare URLs. Please let me know if you find any other issues that need addressing. —Psychonaut (talk) 22:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, here is the rest of my review. The hook's content is supported by the text and the inline refs. Could not detect problems with structure, neutrality and style/language. Did some spotchecks for close paraphrasing but could not find any. QPQ done, therefore...
- ...good to go! GregorB (talk) 12:04, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, GregorB. I've filled in the references for the two bare URLs. Please let me know if you find any other issues that need addressing. —Psychonaut (talk) 22:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- The article is new, created on Dec 26 (or 27, depending on the time zone), obviously large enough with 10,000+ characters of prose. The hook is properly formed, short enough, and reasonably interesting. Inline referencing is used throughout, and there are no unreferenced paragraphs, but there are some bare URLs that need to be fixed per WP:DYKSG D3. There are also three {{cn}} tags, but I don't think this contravenes any of the DYK rules, as well as WP:MINREF, so I don't see a problem there. Will continue the review by tomorrow hopefully. GregorB (talk) 21:01, 20 January 2015 (UTC)