Template:Did you know nominations/World Trade Center station (PATH)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:48, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
World Trade Center station (PATH)
[edit]- ... that the World Trade Center Transportation Hub, built after the September 11 attacks, cost $4 billion and was described as the world's most expensive train station? Sources: (1) NY Times, "How Cost of Train Station at World Trade Center Swelled to $4 Billion", 2014. The cost is in the title. Also, "Its colossal avian presence may yet guarantee the hub a place in the pantheon of civic design in New York. But it cannot escape another, more ignominious distinction as one of the most expensive and most delayed train stations ever built." (2) Business Insider, 2016. "Nearly 15 years after the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the World Trade Center Transportation Hub is now partially open to the public. [...] The design for the station was first revealed in 2004. It was projected to take five years and only $2.2 billion to complete, but after 12 years and many complications, $2.2 billion turned into $4 billion, making the Transportation Hub the most expensive train station ever."
- ALT1:... that the $4 billion World Trade Center Transportation Hub, built after the September 11 attacks, was described as the world's most expensive train station? Source: same as above
- ALT2:... that as part of the contract to build New York City's original World Trade Center, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey acquired a railroad and built a new station for it at the World Trade Center? Source: NY Times, 1962.
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 14:06, 8 July 2018 (UTC).
New enough? 
Became a GA same day it was nominated here. Long enough? More than long enough. Within policy? I think so. Hook short enough? Yes. Content suitable? Entirely suitable, as far as I care tell. WP:QPQ has already been fulfilled, so I am going to pass this nomination with no objections. It seems completely acceptable for DYK. --Katolophyromai (talk) 01:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
