Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/World Naked Gardening Day

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rcsprinter (state) 15:15, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

World Naked Gardening Day

[edit]

Created/expanded by SupernovaExplosion (talk). Self nom at 02:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

  • The article is long enough, and contains plenty of references. It's a bit on the skinny side, and yet it seems that some stretching took place to get to 1,500 characters--I'd even favor scrapping the last two paragraphs, which don't say anything about the event itself. Also, I'd like for the references to be cleaner--that is, templated. Front-page articles need to look good. Ha, can we get a picture? Now, I've been looking at Google News, and I think there's probably material there to expand the historical coverage a bit, and Google Books shows a hit from 2008 that says it was held on 3 May. So, perhaps this needs a bit more work, more material, more sources. Drmies (talk) 03:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
  • I have addressed all these points. Clarified the different dates, added reference names, divided the article into four paras - first introduction, second - purpose according to organizers, third - activities during the event, fourth - a significant example event. --SupernovaExplosion Talk 06:10, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Can you fix the inconsistencies in the references? Only one of them is templated and thus looks very different in the list of references. Drmies (talk) 17:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
  • ALT1 is good to go. The item has a picture now. It's not a high quality article and I'm always of the opinion that lead hooks should be substantial articles. That said, as a lead hook, it would no doubt get a huge number of views. Schwede66 06:19, 3 April 2012 (UTC)