Template:Did you know nominations/Winslade

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by HalfGig talk 02:52, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Winslade

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that although Winslade is a hamlet, it has its own church and civil parish?
  • ALT1:... that Winslade's chapel was sold for £35?
  • ALT2:... that Winslade contains a total of 42 listed buildings, the majority of which are located in Hackwood Park?

• Reviewed: 2017 EFL Cup Final
• Reviewed: Heinrich Parler Peter Parler
• Comment: Regarding ALT1; Winslade's chapel was sold in 1930, and it doesn't count inflation. If it is picked, should I change it to was sold for £30 in 1930? But please disregard this if the original hook is preferred!

Improved to Good Article status by Jaguar (talk). Self-nominated at 23:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC).

• Striking the submitted QPQ, which was inaccurate and inadequate. A new QPQ that is not conducted and written up in three minutes will be required. BlueMoonset (talk) 08:13, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

  I didn't do it in three minutes—why did you say that? JAGUAR  12:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

  Reviewed Heinrich Parler Peter Parler. JAGUAR  12:09, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

• New review needed. Per objections herein to the first review provided by the nominator, the nominator has provided a new QPQ review above. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

• This newly promoted GA is long enough and nominated soon enough. Approving ALT1 and ALT2, although I have changed ALT1 from £30 to £35, as per source and article. I have struck ALT0, basically because there are large numbers of British civil parishes based on hamlets like this one. The article is neutral, but the main problem is with copyright issues. Have a look at this Earwig page and you will see what I mean. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

  Thanks, Cwmhiraeth. I'd like to go with ALT1, if that's OK. I've done some paraphrasing in parts of the history section so it doesn't follow British History Online as much, though most of the sentences are just unavoidable constructions. I thought I'd better get to that before Fram blocks me for a year! JAGUAR  19:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

• I have done a little more rephrasing and I think it is alright now. ALT1 and ALT2 approved, nominator prefers ALT1. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)