Template:Did you know nominations/William Ulmer Brewery
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:10, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
William Ulmer Brewery
- ... that the William Ulmer Brewery, the first brewery to become a New York City landmark, produced up to 3,200,000 U.S. gal (12,000,000 L) of beer per year? Source: NY Times 2010
- ALT1:... that the William Ulmer Brewery, the first brewery designated as a New York City landmark, produced up to 3,200,000 U.S. gal (12,000,000 L) of beer per year? Source: NY Times 2010
- ALT2:... that the William Ulmer Brewery, once one of Brooklyn's busiest breweries, was later partially converted into a private residence? Source: Brooklyn Eagle, NY Times 2008
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Bodega cat
- Comment: I am also including 9H48F here as she also expanded the article a few days ago.
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk) and 9H48F (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 01:45, 22 October 2019 (UTC).
5x expansion verified, no close paraphrasing found, neutral and meets length requirements. The first two hooks are probably the most interesting; hook facts are cited inline and have been verified. A QPQ has been done. I'm not yet giving this the tick yet as there are two questions that I have: although there was no close paraphrasing, Earwigs gave a score of 35.9% to this link, and reading through it, some words do appear to be copied (such as "sole proprietor"), although this might be allowed per WP:LIMITED. Secondly, ALT0 and ALT1 would require metric conversions (like in the article text) for Wikipedia's non-American readers. Once these are resolved this will be good to go. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:44, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: Thanks for the review. I think Earwig's detector gave this result because these lines were previously in the article. I have rephrased them, and added conversion to the hooks as well. epicgenius (talk) 00:52, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. I think is ready to go now. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:14, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
