The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 20:53, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Overall: Interesting, sourced, new, free picture, article meets the prose length at 2,700+. The only problem I see is that the DYK you've done for QPQ (House Bill 5414) passed in June 2022 and was approved in July 2022. Please verify the QPQ problem.HarobouriT • C (he/him) 12:06, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
@Harobouri: I'm not sure I understand the problem with the QPQ – could you elaborate? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 12:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
What is the issue? SL93 (talk) 12:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
@Theleekycauldron:, @SL93: Oops, I did not read thoroughly. I'm very sorry, I'm accepting this DYK. -- HarobouriT • C (he/him) 12:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)