Template:Did you know nominations/Whitley Castle
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 21:04, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Whitley Castle
[edit]- ... that Whitley Castle is the only lozenge shaped Roman fort?
- Reviewed: Kumaon Kingdom
Created/expanded by Chiswick Chap (talk). Self nom at 19:08, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
-
- Interesting article. Date and length fine. Photo correctly licensed. Hook fact cited. Sources reliable. No copy vios. Copy edits (primarily just links). However, please review timeline of construction of the Roman fort. Built c. early to mid 2nd C, demol c. 200, shortly after rebuilt, and again rebuilt c. 300. Need to revise article to reflect timeline, and need to repair reference #4. Also, references 1, 7, and 10 are all the same and should be consolidated. I recommend a variation of your hook:
ALT 1 ... that Whitley Castle (pictured) near Alston, Cumbria, England, is the only lozenge-shaped Roman fort? Anne (talk) 22:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your care. I've corrected the timeline, added evidence for the garrison from altar inscriptions, merged refs and added new refs. Happy with Alt1 hook. Hope all fine now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:04, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
- Interesting article. Date and length fine. Photo correctly licensed. Hook fact cited. Sources reliable. No copy vios. Copy edits (primarily just links). However, please review timeline of construction of the Roman fort. Built c. early to mid 2nd C, demol c. 200, shortly after rebuilt, and again rebuilt c. 300. Need to revise article to reflect timeline, and need to repair reference #4. Also, references 1, 7, and 10 are all the same and should be consolidated. I recommend a variation of your hook: