Template:Did you know nominations/White-tufted grebe
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:51, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
White-tufted grebe
[edit]- ... that the white-tufted grebe breeds in freshwater locations but outside the breeding season may be found on the sea?
- Reviewed: Philip Skene
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nominated at 06:03, 8 July 2014 (UTC).
- 5x expand ok,
checking the rest.....I'd change "rufous" to "red-brown" as (a) more accessible and (b) more distant from source. I'd move the mention of white sides of the head and throat to just after dark brown plumage to (a) distance from source and (b) because it helps immediately give an overall picture of the bird's nonbreeding appearance. I'd just say it had an extensive range not a very extensive one. Have we discussed using IBC as a ref before? Not sure but if we can at all use others I think it would be better. also can then cite the ranges of the races.No unavoidable close paraphrasing seen - agree that I'd be loath to change "marshy ponds" without risking losing meaning. Material otherwise faithful to sources. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:16, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- I have made the changes you suggested including IBC --> Avibase. It is difficult describing a bird starting from a technical description without either close paraphrasing or departing too far from the meaning of the original, especially as such descriptions always stick to a certain order of presenting the material. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:51, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- 5x expand ok,