Template:Did you know nominations/We're the Superhumans
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by MPJ-DK 12:57, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
We're the Superhumans
[edit]- ... that Channel 4's 2016 Paralympics trailer "We're the Superhumans" featured a big band composed of musicians with disabilities?
- ALT1:... that Channel 4's 2016 Paralympics trailer "We're the Superhumans" featured both Paralympic athletes and "everyday" people with disabilities?
- ALT2:... that Channel 4's 2016 Paralympics trailer "We're the Superhumans" had higher engagement on Twitter than the BBC's Olympics trailer?
- ALT3: ... that a Channel 4 executive stated that "We're the Superhumans" featured more cast members with disabilities than "the whole history of British advertising altogether"?
- Reviewed: China–Hong Kong football rivalry
Created by ViperSnake151 (talk). Self-nominated at 06:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC).
Approval for main hook, ALT1 and AL2 with my recommendation being the main hook as the most interesting. My reservation about ALT3 is that it's the opinion of someone directly involved with the subject, while this is fine in the article I don't think it's ideal for a DYK hook. Otherwise the article meets newness and length requirements, is well-written and cited with no paraphrasing problems, hooks meet formatting guidelines and are cited, QPQ done.
- Just a thought – I found the image of Oscar Pistorius slightly distracting in view of events since that photo was taken. I appreciate that it was included to show Ellie Simmonds and the other available images of her are not particularly good, but Hannah Cockroft has a good image that could be used instead. January (talk) 09:54, 17 September 2016 (UTC)