The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: DYKcheck will not flag as a 5x because of very old (2013) revisions that were crufty and unsourced. There were 372 chars readable prose prior to my edits, and there are now 2,860.
5x expanded by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 08:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC).
Overall:
Article was nominated within 7 days of being 5× expanded. It is well-sourced and uses inline citations, with neutral coverage of its topic and no copyright violations according to Earwig. The hook is quite interesting and stated in the prose while being backed by a reliable source. QPQ requirement met. This one is good to go. Aria1561 (talk) 17:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)