Template:Did you know nominations/Virdem
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by AirshipJungleman29 talk 19:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Virdem
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Changeworld1984 (talk) 21:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC).
- I will review this. TompaDompa (talk) 22:36, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- No.
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing: - No.
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - No.
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
Article created on 19 March. It does not meet the length requirement (despite some needless repetition that artificially inflates the length), and substantial copyediting is needed for grammar and whatnot. The sources appear to be reliable ones, but they do not verify all the information in the article (and are not cited in all places where they should be); I have added some maintenance tags to this effect. There are no obvious neutrality issues. Earwig reveals no copyvio, but this is a false negative caused by the tool's inability to parse Google Books text—for instance, the article says It was written by Ralf Burger in 1986 as a demonstration program for Chaos Computer Club conference.
while the source says It was written by Ralf Burger as a demonstration program for the Chaos Computer Club conference [...]
, which is obviously way too WP:Close paraphrasing. The hook is properly cited and interesting. This is the nominator's first DYK nomination, so they are QPQ exempt. TompaDompa (talk) 23:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC)