Template:Did you know nominations/Verfassungsblog

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 21:38, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Verfassungsblog

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that a law blog has been cited by the supreme courts of Poland and Germany? Source: http://www.sn.pl/sites/orzecznictwo/OrzeczeniaHTML/ii%20po%203-19-5.docx.html https://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de/cgi-bin/rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bgh&Art=en&nr=94971&pos=0&anz=1
  • ALT1:... that a 2020 European Commission report described a German blog as a "widely read platform for discussions on rule of law related topics"? Source: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/de_rol_country_chapter.pdf

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Freddie Gilroy and the Belsen Stragglers

Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 10:19, 7 October 2020 (UTC).

• General eligibility:

• New enough:
• Long enough:
• Other problems:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
• Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Recently created, no sourcing issues, no grammatical or spelling errors, and nothing else preventing this from becoming a DYK. IMO the first hook is better. Jon698 (talk) 16:36, 10 October 2020 (UTC)