Template:Did you know nominations/United States Senate election in Florida, 1970

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:46, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

United States Senate election in Florida, 1970

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that in order to increase his name recognition, Lawton Chiles walked 1,003 miles (1,614 km) across Florida for his United States Senate campaign in 1970?

• Reviewed: Just Cause 2

Created/expanded by 12george1 (talk). Self-nominated at 06:27, 6 October 2016 (UTC).

Expanded prose from 1802 B to 16 KB accordign to User:Dr pda/prosesize.js, so easily more than 5x and 1,500 chars requirements. Hook is cited, is very interesting, and easily verified. Article generally seems neutral and important facts are cited. Earwig copyvio detects no issue. HaEr48 (talk) 18:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

The review you used as QPQ seems strucked out though. Does that still count? HaEr48 (talk) 18:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC) 12george1 supplied another review as QPQ. HaEr48 (talk) 00:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

• HaEr48, good question. As 12george1 has struck that review, it is not usable as a QPQ. Another review will have to be supplied in its stead. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
  • I have done a review of a different hook--12george1 (talk) 21:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
    • 12george1, a review needs to be a complete review of both article and hook(s) in order to count as a QPQ. So in addition to noting a couple of problems with the hook, you need to cover article length, newness, close paraphrasing, neutrality, sourcing, and all the other DYK criteria, for this QPQ to be usable. Let us know when you've updated the review with the rest of it. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:37, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
      • Added that stuff to the review. Sorry for waiting 5 days--12george1 (talk) 02:47, 30 October 2016 (UTC)