Template:Did you know nominations/United States Invitational Young Physicists Tournament
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 17:31, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
United States Invitational Young Physicists Tournament
[edit]- ... that in 2008, an Australian girls' school defeated an American boys' school for the United States Invitational Young Physicists Tournament championship?
- I'm not going to review something else, yet -- first time at DYK, and I want to understand the process first. I promise to review a couple of these after this passes or doesn't. :-)
Created/expanded by Moishe Rosenbaum (talk). Self nom at 12:47, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Mostly good. New enough, long enough, didn't see any close paraphrasing. Hook fact checks out (I'll AGF the source I can't see, but I also verified it on a source I can see). The "Results" section of the article was unsourced. Since there is no one source that covers all years' results, I think a footnoted source is needed for each row of the table. I've added sources for two of them. When that's done, this will be good to go!
- PS - You've done a nice job of finding multiple third-party sources. However, for future reference, for a contest where the sponsoring organization is the main source of information, it's OK to cite that sponsor as the source for items such as "who won." --Orlady (talk) 17:56, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you, Orlady. It certainly makes sense to footnote each row. All of the results information is contained in each year's The Physics Teacher article. I went through and referenced each year's results to the proper article. The TPT articles actually have considerably more detail about results than the USAYPT website -- Go figure. But I take your point about the sponsoring organization being a reliable source for its own tournament's results. I suppose we can and do use NFL.com for Super Bowl results, eh? :-) Thank you for the review! Hope the footnotes look right now.Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 01:44, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
