Template:Did you know nominations/United States' Telegraph
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 20:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
United States' Telegraph
- ... that the chief editor of the United States' Telegraph gouged a rival reporter's eyes inside a Senate office? Source: Smith, Kenneth Laurence (1981). Duff Green and the United States' Telegraph, 1826-1837, p. 70 https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3580&context=etd
Created by Generalissima (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 39 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 06:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC).
- This should be interesting. I'll review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Wonderful work! I enjoyed reading this (I just love old newspapers! ). Looks good to go. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- The fact does sound interesting, but unfortunately, according to Fletcher M. Green in "Duff Green, Militant Journalist of the Old School," Duff Green "denied that he was armed or that he gouged Sparhawk's eyes," and it doesn't help that it was Sparhawk who made the original charge. There's not much of a way to prove that this for sure happened, so a different hook might need to be picked unless I can for sure confirm that this truly happened. PrimalMustelid (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Forgot to ping @Generalissima and @BeanieFan11. PrimalMustelid (talk) 20:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Why not just "that the chief editor of the United States' Telegraph allegedly gouged a rival reporter's eyes inside a Senate office?" Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 20:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm a bit reluctant still, but I suppose it works better. PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- The article/citations would need to be adjusted accordingly Generalissima. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- The article/citations would need to be adjusted accordingly Generalissima. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm a bit reluctant still, but I suppose it works better. PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Why not just "that the chief editor of the United States' Telegraph allegedly gouged a rival reporter's eyes inside a Senate office?" Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 20:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Forgot to ping @Generalissima and @BeanieFan11. PrimalMustelid (talk) 20:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)