Template:Did you know nominations/Uncertainty (book)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 10:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Uncertainty (book), Beyond Uncertainty
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
Heisenberg in 1933
- ... that, contrary to popular belief, the biographies Uncertainty and Beyond Uncertainty show that there is no evidence that Werner Heisenberg (pictured) impeded the German nuclear weapons program to prevent Hitler from obtaining a bomb? Source: "With regard to the so-called moral positions that motivated Heisenberg and his German colleagues in their failure to produce atomic weapons (expressed mainly by themselves), Cassidy – hopefully for the last time – clearly debunks the claim that there were any" (1) and "I could not agree more with Cassidy when he states that: '...there is nothing to support the notion that Heisenberg actually hindered the project in any way to keep an explosive out of Hitler's hands'" (2) There are other sources as well, it was a major talking point of reviews.
- ALT1:... that according to his biographies, Uncertainty and Beyond Uncertainty, Werner Heisenberg's (pictured) ethical concerns did not hinder his work on the German nuclear weapons program? Source: Ibid and several others
- Reviewed:
Exempt (4 credits at time of nomination, I have reviewed several, though)Footlessmouse (talk) 22:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC) - Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Emperor's Bible and Template:Did you know nominations/Flag of Columbus, Ohio
- Comment: Am quick to respond and am willing to find alternative hooks as needed
- Reviewed:
Created by Footlessmouse (talk). Self-nominated at 21:46, 7 December 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
QPQ: 
- I don't think you're exempt, since I would count The Color of Law to be your fifth; by the time this is promoted you're gonna need to QPQ it (see WP:DYKRULES). Since this is a double barreled nomination you should provide 2 reviews.
Overall: 
Nice work on the articles! (t · c) buidhe 16:08, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Buidhe: Thank you for the review. I misread the guidelines, I thought it was 5 credits as of nomination not as of promotion. I have included two QPQ reviews here and will add to the others on the approved page once one of them is moved to the prep area. Footlessmouse (talk) 22:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Buidhe: I have added QPQ to all of my previous nominations and have added them above. Did you have any other suggestions? Thanks again! Footlessmouse (talk) 08:20, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Buidhe: It has been 10 days, are you going to have a chance to finish this, or should we ask for a new review? Thanks. Footlessmouse (talk) 19:27, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
