Template:Did you know nominations/UKIP: The First 100 Days

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 12:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

UKIP: The First 100 Days

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the 2015 mockumentary UKIP: The First 100 Days received more complaints to Ofcom than any programme from 2014?

• Reviewed: Escape (EP)

5x expanded by The Almightey Drill (talk), This is Paul (talk). Nominated by The Almightey Drill (talk) at 18:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC).

• Review by The Herald

• The article is new: Y
• The article is long enough: Y
• The hook is interesting: Y
• The hook/article is well cited: Y
• The hook is below 200 characters: Y
• A google search does not reveal any copyright violations: Y
• The article follows most other important policies: Y
• QPQ: Y
• Image: Y
• Paraphrasing: Y

• Result: The article look fine to me but a few more cites in plot section will do nothing bad. Currently, it have a single cite and need slight expansion. -The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 15:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

• More inline citations added '''tAD''' (talk) 15:53, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

• All looks good to go. Nicely cited now for mainpage. Thanks..-The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 04:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC)