Template:Did you know nominations/Typhoon Zola (1990)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Typhoon Zola (1990)

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Typhoon Zola was responsible for 15.1 billion yen (US$104 million) in damages? Source: Digital Typhoon currency conversion
  • ALT1:... that Typhoon Zola flooded 420 houses in Japan? Source: Digital Typhoon

• Reviewed: Peter Schmidt (economist)

Created by Yellow Evan (talk). Self-nominated at 16:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC).

• When was the article officially created as a new article? It looks like it was nominated on July 8. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

• Moved to mainspace July 1. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 13:54, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

• Long enough, and less than 3 hours over the 7-day nomination allowance period, which is so close that I'm willing to state that it's new enough, QPQ done, all non-lead ¶ with citations, a copyvio check reveals no problems, hook content is interesting. There is no inline citation verifying content of ALT1 at the end of the sentence stating this in the article. This source verifies the first hook, but is it a reliable source? North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

• @Northamerica1000: Given it's been used in multiple FAC's, and is published by a professor at a research laboratory, yes. ATL 1 is verified in the hook in the line. "Inundated Houses 420". Inundated is basically a fancy word for flooded. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 14:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

• @Yellow Evan: Okay, but the ALT still needs an inline citation, per 3b of the WP:DYKRULES: "Each fact in the hook must be supported in the article by at least one inline citation to a reliable source, appearing no later than the end of the sentence(s) offering that fact. Citations at the end of the paragraph are not sufficient". North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

• Ridiculous, but added. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 14:50, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

• Good to go. Sorry for your troubles; I didn't invent the inline citation rule, but I have to abide by it. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)