Template:Did you know nominations/Typhoon Nanmadol (2004)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Typhoon Nanmadol (2004)
[edit]
- ... that in 2004, Typhoon Nanmadol (pictured) became the first December tropical cyclone to strike the island of Taiwan in 108 years of record-keeping?
- Reviewed: Not a self-nomination
Improved to Good Article status by TheAustinMan (talk). Nominated by Oceanh (talk) at 22:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC).
Recently promoted to GA, long enough and well referenced. No close paraphrasing found on spotcheck. I have removed "[108 years] of record-keeping" from the hook since this is not mentioned in either of the citations given for the hook fact, and IMO the hook is just as interesting without it. Image is PD and looks good at thumbnail size. 97198 (talk) 04:14, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
- What 97198 did is change in 108 years of recordkeeping to in 108 years. But that's not a good idea, because it strongly implies that there was an earlier event 109 years ago. I propose:
- ALT1: ... that in 2004, Typhoon Nanmadol (pictured) became the first December tropical cyclone to strike the island of Taiwan in at least 108 years?
- EEng (talk) 02:11, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- What 97198 did is change in 108 years of recordkeeping to in 108 years. But that's not a good idea, because it strongly implies that there was an earlier event 109 years ago. I propose:
- Well, this is slightly embarrassing - I reread the source and it does in fact mention when the record-keeping began (not as explicitly as I had initially expected). Thanks for the alt hook, EEng, but I think the original hook (which I have reverted to its first version, mentioning the records) is in fact good to go. 97198 (talk) 12:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
