Template:Did you know nominations/Tripura Upanishad
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by —♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 15:48, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Tripura Upanishad
[edit]
Sricakra
- ... that Sricakra (pictured) is mentioned in Tripura Upanishad – a medieval era introductory text on a secrecy-filled Tantra tradition that developed in a period of political instability?
- ALT1:... that the Hindu text Tripura Upanishad states Moksha and religious freedom is the attainment of one's own real nature?
- Reviewed: Tina Allen
Created by Ms Sarah Welch (talk) and Nvvchar (talk). Nominated by Ms Sarah Welch (talk) at 16:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC).
- ALT2: ...that the Tripura Upanishad is a Hindu text notable as a complete introduction to the Shakta Tantra tradition?
ALT3: ...that the Tripura Upanishad's 16 verses introduce the goddess Tripura as the Hindu divine mother and ultimate Godhead of the Hindu pantheon?
- ALT2: ...that the Tripura Upanishad is a Hindu text notable as a complete introduction to the Shakta Tantra tradition?
Excellent article. I took the liberty of re-arranging the lede a bit to make it a little less reliant on internal jargon. New enough, long enough, all of the hooks above are cited. I'm not a fan of the first hook because it starts off-topic which rarely works (IMHO). For the author: if you continue working on this, perhaps some counterpoints to Brooks? Waiting on QPQ, nom appears to have five articles in this list alone. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Maury Markowitz: Did you miss the Tina Allen QPQ above? I have done dozens of DYK reviews, and if you check the credits you should find I have more review credits than noms. On counterpoint to Brooks, I would love to add it, but there isn't WP:RS with counterpoint available (if you know any, please identify). I have struck out ALT3 you proposed because it neither accurately reflects the Tripura Upanishad nor is supported by the article/sources. I also trimmed ALT2 for the same reason and to correct the wikilink because neither all nor most Hindu texts are Upanishads. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:25, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- ALT4: ... that the Tripura Upanishad is a medieval era introductory text on Sricakra (pictured) and a secrecy-filled Tantra tradition that developed in a period of political instability? Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:25, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
I did miss the QPQ. All good to go. Prefer ALT2. Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:54, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
