Template:Did you know nominations/TriGem

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 04:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

TriGem

(

)

... that TriGem was South Korea's first company dedicated to manufacturing computers? Source: "Established in 1980, TriGem was Korea's first computer maker and, unlike large Korean conglomerates like Samsung, Hyundai and Daewoo, with ventures in cars and other areas, TriGem concentrates on manufacturing only computers." Sakowski, Nat (September 9, 1990). "TriGem, aiming to become an Asian Compaq, begins producing its own PC line". Marketing Computers. The Nielsen Company. 10 (9): 38 – via Gale.
- ALT1: ... that in 1981, TriGem introduced the first microcomputer built in South Korea? Source: Campbell-Kelly, Martin; Daniel D. Garcia-Swartz (2015). From Mainframes to Smartphones: A History of the International Computer Industry. Harvard University Press. p. 144. ISBN 9780674286559 – via Google Books.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/1994 Mascara earthquake

Created by DigitalIceAge (talk). Self-nominated at 22:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article and hook satisfy all criteria for DYK and I see no reason to approve this hook as soon as QPQ has been satisfied as well. JJonahJackalope (talk) 17:50, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

@JJonahJackalope: Thank you very much for the review! QPQ now done. DigitalIceAge (talk) 23:47, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Fantastic, just looked it over again and changed the status, should be good to go. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 23:55, 3 December 2022 (UTC)