Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Treaty of Kępno

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:52, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Treaty of Kępno

[edit]

Przemysł II of Poland

Created/expanded by Volunteer Marek (talk). Self nom at 10:34, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Reviewed Turnhalle Constitutional Conference

  • No problems with the article; the article is long enough and new enough, and the sources (all print, which is even better) appear to be reliable. Good work! Unfortunately, the hook is slightly over the 200 character maximum; what if you simply chop "conferred control over Gdańsk Pomerania to Poland, led to Przemysł becoming king, and"? Saying "that the Treaty of Kępno (1282) between Mestwin II and Przemysł II (pictured) facilitated the reunification of Poland?" would be quite sufficient. Nyttend (talk) 03:31, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Would "... that the Treaty of Kępno (1282) between Mestwin II and Przemysł II (pictured) transferred control over Gdańsk Pomerania and facilitated the reunification of Poland?" work? That should be under 200 and also convey the gist of the treaty.  Volunteer Marek  10:26, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

I can't remember what we count and what we don't count (e.g. the ellipsis at the start, the quotation marks, the question mark at the end), but if you count everything from the first quotation mark to the second, it's just 169 characters, so this works. Hook reflects the article, so no problems with its content, either. By the way, the painting is by Jan Matejko (dead for 118 or 119 years), so there's no copyright issue. Since the article itself was already cleared, ready to go. Nyttend (talk) 11:46, 15 September 2011 (UTC)