Template:Did you know nominations/Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:25, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019
... that the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2018 introduced by the Indian Parliament was met with protests and criticism by the transgender community?Source: Colleges join hands to protest against Transgender Bill 2018- ALT1:
... that the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019 introduced by the Indian Parliament has met with protests and criticism by the transgender community?Source: Trans Bill 2019 passed in Lok Sabha: Why the trans community in India is rejecting it - ALT2: ... that the transgender community has protested and criticized the the bill for protection of their rights introduced by the Indian Parliament?
- ALT1:
Created by Tamravidhir (talk). Self-nominated at 14:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC).
- Reviewed: Exempted, in absence of required number of DYKNs.
- Comment: Content copied from user-space to main-space on the same date as article creation.
QPQ not needed. New enough, plenty long enough, with a cited and present hook. As a note for the future, reference citations go after periods when placed at the end of sentences and after commas at the end of a clause. This is ready to go. Raymie (t • c) 04:42, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Raymie: Thank you. I shall certainly keep note of that. To state, I am in favour of ALT1 or ALT2, out of the three, going on the main page and wanted to hear from you about that. Lastly, could we have this on the main page on 6 September 2019, given the date marks a year since the judicial mandate decriminalising homosexuality in India? --Tamravidhir (talk) 09:06, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- Umm, I think 6 September is too late, almost half a month away, I am cool with ALT1/2 up on the main page before that. --Tamravidhir (talk) 09:12, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- Drive-by comment: Instead of repeating the word "transgender" in ALT1, say something else. Yoninah (talk) 19:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- ALT3: ... that the 2019 Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill introduced by the Indian Parliament has met with protests and criticism by the queer community?" - does this look fine? -Tamravidhir (talk) 02:29, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- Umm, I think 6 September is too late, almost half a month away, I am cool with ALT1/2 up on the main page before that. --Tamravidhir (talk) 09:12, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Raymie: Thank you. I shall certainly keep note of that. To state, I am in favour of ALT1 or ALT2, out of the three, going on the main page and wanted to hear from you about that. Lastly, could we have this on the main page on 6 September 2019, given the date marks a year since the judicial mandate decriminalising homosexuality in India? --Tamravidhir (talk) 09:06, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
