Template:Did you know nominations/Tourism in Iraq
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 4meter4 (talk) 02:59, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Tourism in Iraq
[edit]- ... that tourism in Iraq is in danger because of the ongoing war against ISIS?
Created by Human3015 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC).
Looks new enough and (barely) long enough. Sources look reliable. No plagiarism visible, nor copyright violations on the tools save for a "The association of hotels annouced in 2015 that tourism in Kurdistan is going through worst stages of the season" which may be too similar. However: The article needs a lot of copyediting - "Continued violence discourage" is not proper grammar, for example, I might do it myself tomorrow. The hook might too - isn't "of the ongoing" better? The "is said" might specify who is saying these things. Also, is it necessary for the "UNESCO" section to copy the origin page almost verbatim? Otherwise hook OK (a bit obvious though) and QPQ is done.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus: Thanks for your nice review. I have tweaked hook, done some copy-editing on article for grammar. Name of UNESCO sites will remain same as written in UNESCO list. We usually write same name as written in list. You can read any article of UNESCO sites list they mention name as per list of UNESCO.--Human3015TALK 00:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- OK. The article still has some grammar/spelling problems, though - "government seeking 3 fold" is missing the verb, for example. I'll see if I can clean it up a bit.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:32, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus: Thanks for your copy-edit. If article has any more issue let me know. If article is ok now then you may give tick mark to this to close this issue. --Human3015TALK 16:10, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus: Thanks for your nice review. I have tweaked hook, done some copy-editing on article for grammar. Name of UNESCO sites will remain same as written in UNESCO list. We usually write same name as written in list. You can read any article of UNESCO sites list they mention name as per list of UNESCO.--Human3015TALK 00:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Basic reequirements are satisfied, it seems.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:31, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
