The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 14:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Overall: Cwmhiraeth, I assess that this article meets or exceeds all DYK criteria. The hook is "hooky" enough, and is of an appropriate length at 166 characters. The hook's content has been verified, and the article uses verifiable sources with inline citations. The article is also new enough and long enough, and the QPQ has been completed. West Virginian (talk) 02:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this but I don't see in the hook source (1) any connection between this species and Fabricius discovering it, or (2) any mention of Fabricius working as a missionary; he seems to have spent his time as a naturalist. Yoninah (talk) 22:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
@Yoninah: The species box has a citation for Fabricius being the first to describe the species, and I have added a citation for his missionary work. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. Restoring tick (for online and foreign-language sources) per West Virginian's review. Yoninah (talk) 13:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)