The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Overall: ALT0 is not followed directly by a citation; also, the time period for its ascendancy in size is not mentioned. However, ALT1 is both good to go and more interesting. Recommend ALT0 be struck. Other than ALT0, article is fit for DYK.Georgejdorner (talk) 18:24, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
No problem with ALT0 being struck if you prefer ALT1 anyway. Harriastalk 19:32, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
ALT0 struck per nominator's agreement. Nomination GTG for DYK.Georgejdorner (talk) 20:38, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
The source says it was notable for the remains, not "rare". I made the change in the hook as I promoted it to prep. Yoninah (talk) 22:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)