Template:Did you know nominations/Tombs of Battashewala Complex
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 15:01, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Tombs of Battashewala Complex
[edit]
... that the Tombs of Battashewala Complex (pictured) have been refurbished at a cost of US$ 750,000, funded under the US Ambassadors Fund for Cultural Preservation Projects?
5x expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Self-nominated at 01:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC).
This article is a five-fold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The image is appropriately licensed, the hook facts are cited, the article is neutral and I detected no policy issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Please link this article to at least one other Wikipedia article, so it won't be an orphan. Yoninah (talk) 09:24, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Thanks. Linked with Humayun's Tomb.--Nvvchar. 13:36, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
-
- I just read the article and would like to suggest a different hook:
- ALT1: ... that before the Archaeological Survey of India acquired the 400-year-old Tombs of Battashewala Complex (pictured), the site was leased as a youth camping ground? Yoninah (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- No problem. It is fine.--Nvvchar. 13:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
-
- Cwmhiraeth, would you mind also checking ALT1? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:13, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- ALT1 is both acceptable and better than the original hook, and I have struck the latter. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:56, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Cwmhiraeth. Just added "pictured" to ALT1 in case the promoter wants to use the picture. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:19, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
