Template:Did you know nominations/Time viewer

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Dying (talk) 14:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Time viewer

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that science fiction authors that want to avoid the paradoxes associated with time travel may instead write about time viewers? Source: All the Wonder that Would Be: Exploring Past Notions of the Future, p. 128, Time Machines: Time Travel in Physics, Metaphysics, and Science Fiction, p. 57
  • ALT1: ... that science fiction authors that want to avoid the paradoxes associated with time machines may instead write about time viewers? Source: All the Wonder that Would Be: Exploring Past Notions of the Future, p. 128, Time Machines: Time Travel in Physics, Metaphysics, and Science Fiction, p. 57
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Celmisia major
  • Comment: The hooks are identical apart from "time travel" vs. "time machines"; I have no strong preference either way.

Improved to Good Article status by TompaDompa (talk). Self-nominated at 09:51, 11 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Time viewer; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• Article has achieved Good Article status. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hooks are interesting and sourced. I think the primary hook is best as it is the broadest. QPQ is done. Looks ready to go. Congratulations on this excellent article! Thriley (talk) 12:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)