Template:Did you know nominations/Ticketmaster v. Tickets.com

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 15:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Ticketmaster v. Tickets.com

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that in Ticketmaster v. Tickets.com Judge Harry Lindley Hupp ruled that URLs were not copyrightable because they consisted of "functional and factual elements"?

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/J. P. Shelton
• Comment: ALT1: ... that in Ticketmaster v. Tickets.com Judge Harry Lindley Hupp ruled that deep linking did not violate the Copyright Act of 1976 because it did not involve direct copying?

Created/expanded by Cunard (talk). Self nom at 00:15, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

• Good to go. Savidan 00:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)