Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Athol Joyce
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rcsprinter (gab) @ 22:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Thomas Athol Joyce
[edit]- ... that Thomas Athol Joyce's entry in the Encyclopædia Britannica for "Negro" was said to be ridiculous?
- Reviewed: Eulithomyrmex
Created by Victuallers (talk). Self nominated at 09:26, 2 December 2013 (UTC).
- At first glance I thought the hook referred to an entry about Joyce, rather than written by him. Would this be better?
- ALT1 * ... that the entry for "Negro" written by Thomas Athol Joyce for the Encyclopædia Britannica was said to be ridiculous?
- Article is newly created, long enough and well-referenced. Hook fact is properly cited, and I have confirmed it with an online source (Oxford DNB). The original hook is properly formatted and interesting. QPQ done. --Bcp67 (talk) 20:55, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Tick for ALT1 - I agree - its better Victuallers (talk) 22:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Article is newly created, long enough and well-referenced. Hook fact is properly cited, and I have confirmed it with an online source (Oxford DNB). The original hook is properly formatted and interesting. QPQ done. --Bcp67 (talk) 20:55, 2 December 2013 (UTC)