Template:Did you know nominations/Third Josef Hoop cabinet
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 19:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Third Josef Hoop cabinet
- ... that the Third Josef Hoop cabinet was formed as a coalition government following the Anschluss?
- Source: Multiple, see inline
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/ChinaAngVirus disinformation campaign
- Comment: Hook is open to change.
Improved to Good Article status by TheBritinator (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.
TheBritinator (talk) 22:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC).
@TheBritinator: Article is long enough and improved to good article a day before DYK nomination. Article is presentable, well-sourced, and free from copyvio. QPQ done. The only problem I have is the hook, which I think depends entirely on prior history knowledge, and even then is not especially eye-catching. Please let me know what you think of these alternate hooks:
- ALT1: ...that the Third Josef Hoop cabinet unsuccessfully negotiated the transfer of a mountain to Switzerland?
- ALT2: ...that the Third Josef Hoop cabinet survived an attempted coup from a domestic Nazi party?
- Kimikel (talk) 01:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Kimikel:, these are both hooks that have been used on their respective articles already, but I am not opposed to them if it doesn't cause any issues. If so, then I would say go with ALT2 as it is more catching, but either is good. By the way, I noticed that you did not leave me a message on my talk page with the provided template, so I didn't notice your review sooner. Please do that for future reference. Thanks. TheBritinator (talk) 14:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Approving ALT2: Good catch on the hook reuse, I apologize for missing that and also for not posting on your talk page. I think the Ellhorn hook is very close to that article's hook, but since the putsch DYK never ran, I don't see an issue there. Thank you for the nomination TheBritinator - Kimikel (talk) 18:29, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oh that's right, the putsch one didn't run and was put on OTD instead. Shouldn't be an issue then. Thanks for the review. TheBritinator (talk) 20:04, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Kimikel:, these are both hooks that have been used on their respective articles already, but I am not opposed to them if it doesn't cause any issues. If so, then I would say go with ALT2 as it is more catching, but either is good. By the way, I noticed that you did not leave me a message on my talk page with the provided template, so I didn't notice your review sooner. Please do that for future reference. Thanks. TheBritinator (talk) 14:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
