Template:Did you know nominations/The Wolf and the Lion (film)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Wolf and the Lion (film)
- ... that a wolf and lion cub were raised together since they were five weeks old to film The Wolf and the Lion? Source: Loustalot, Ghislain (16 October 2021). "Le loup et le lion, une fraternité à croquer" [The wolf and the lion, a brotherhood to chew on]. Paris Match (in French).
In fiction and in life, they started being raised together when they were 5 weeks old. They slept close together, played and ate shoulder to shoulder. And they grew up under the cameras of Gilles de Maistre during the two years of filming.
- Comment: This is my first DYK nomination. Any advice is appreciated. Am I supposed to review one?
Note that the source provided is in French, but I have inserted a Google Chrome translation into the citation template for reference.
- Comment: This is my first DYK nomination. Any advice is appreciated. Am I supposed to review one?
Created by 2pou (talk). Self-nominated at 18:52, 4 February 2022 (UTC).
Hi there, 2pou, and welcome to DYK! Looks like this is a new article, it's long enough, well-sourced, neutral, and plagiarism-free. The hook is cited (next time, do try to include the citation at the end of the hook sentence in the article) and interesting. You're not going to need another QPQ, since you don't have five DYK credits yet. However, I'm a little concerned about the state of the article. While it is, like I said before, long enough and well-sourced, the sources don't show that the article is notable. The article is definitely notable, but I think you should add some more reviews from reliable sources—how about this one from the Los Angeles Times? We should be good to go after that—we're almost there :D Great work, 2pou! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 00:09, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review and tips, Theleekycauldron! I can certainly flush out the reception section. In general, are all comments supposed to be addressed within a week of the new or expansion date, or is that just the window to start the process? -2pou (talk) 19:33, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- @2pou: good question! the latter's correct—as long as you nominate the article within the seven-day window, you can take... well, pretty much as long as everyone needs. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 09:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- OK, Theleekycauldron. I think I've flushed it out fairly well. I usually don't like to have quotes that are too long, but I felt this one summed up everything, and breaking it up felt a little disjointed. Let me know your thoughts whenever you have time. Is there a place that DYK credits are tracked? -2pou (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review and tips, Theleekycauldron! I can certainly flush out the reception section. In general, are all comments supposed to be addressed within a week of the new or expansion date, or is that just the window to start the process? -2pou (talk) 19:33, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Promoting the main hook (ALT0) to Prep 4 – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)