The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Overall: epicgenius (talk) 17:54, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
@matt - Not that this affects the article itself, but you should consider adding some categories to this article. Also, your hook is cutting it close with 196 out of 200 characters (just an observation, not anything to be concerned about).However, you do need to do a quid pro quo, since you have more than 5 DYK's. Otherwise, the nomination is ready to be approved. epicgenius (talk) 17:54, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. QPQ done for Mark Tatulli. Haven't written an article for a LONG time (!) so completely forgot about categories! <Goes off to add some categories>... matt (talk) 14:56, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
@matt - Thanks for doing the QPQ. Now I think this DYK is to good to go. epicgenius (talk) 21:02, 25 September 2016 (UTC)