The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kimikeltalk 01:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Not a full review, but I'd recommend brainstorming new hooks. The second hook seems to namedrop names likely to be unfamilar to the reader, and the first hook runs afoul of WP:DYKFICTION. Bremps... 01:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, is neutral and plagiarism free. The hooks are cited, but as with Bremps I think there are more interesting things than the line-up changing (if you think about the Sugababes it's not unusual). I wonder about a hook about the song supporting gay marriage. I put a ? for well sourced, as I was surprised the reception section was so short - I would like to see this expanded, especially since the article is only just over the character count, perhaps these might help, see here & here. QPQ is done. I struck the earlier ALTs, so per the above comment. I appreciate you've been waiting a while Bogger! Lajmmoore (talk) 11:17, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks Lajmmoore, I've added some reviews to reception section. (Most reviews I've found were, unfortunately, in versions of The Mail). I'll find some hooks about them and the referendum.-Bogger (talk) 11:30, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you Bogger - both those hooks are checked and OK and the reception section is improved, which I think strengthens the article. Tick to follow Lajmmoore (talk) 08:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)