Template:Did you know nominations/The Hunger Games Musical
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by BlueMoonset talk 21:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
The Hunger Games Musical
- ... that the creators of "The Hunger Games Musical" were surprised to learn their music video, "Peeta's Song", was entered in a fan art contest that it went on to win? Source: 'The "Studio C" video, "The Hunger Games Musical: Mockingjay Parody - Peeta's Song," published in October 2014, received more than 2 million views on YouTube and is competing in the fan-made music video category. According to "Studio C" producer Jared Shores, the cast and crew were unaware that the video was selected for the competition. "The exposure was a fun surprise to all of us," Shores wrote in an email interview'. From Sarah Sanders Petersen (October 13, 2015). "Studio C Hunger Games Video Holding No. 1 Spot as Samsung Competition Progresses", Deseret News; and 'Winner of this category had over 50,000 votes, guys. Let's take a look at just a little snippet of Studio C's Mockingjay parody: "Peeta's Song".' From "The Hunger Games Tribute Fan Event—Powered By Samsung", 19:51–20:10 (November 5, 2015).
- Reviewed: [nomination withdrawn Hydrangeans (she/her) (talk | edits) 09:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC)]
Created by Hydrangeans (talk). Self-nominated at 00:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Hunger Games Musical; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Comment. I have passed by and read this article now numerous times. The main issue appears to be the sourcing. I'm not convinced Third Hour, for example, would be considered a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. It looks like a blog with no explicit editorial standards for accuracy; in fact it has a disclaimer at the bottom of the page about the views of its users who submit content. Cielquiparle (talk) 07:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Cielquiparle: Thanks for your comment, and for your feedback. Out of an abundance of caution, I've removed citations to that site and trimmed content dependent on those citations. Hydrangeans (she/her) (talk) 23:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Out of a further abundance of caution and in consideration of the ongoing backlog (permanent link), I'd like to withdraw this nomination. Hydrangeans (she/her) (talk | edits) 09:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC)