Template:Did you know nominations/The Hamilton Crowne Plaza, Washington, D.C.

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:44, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
referencing

The Hamilton Crowne Plaza, Washington, D.C.

(

)

... that although The Hamilton Crowne Plaza features some 1920s Art Deco-style rooms, the remainder of the interior is modern?

ALT1:... that The Hamilton Crowne Plaza features its 1920s Art Deco lobby however all of the other rooms in the hotel are modern?
ALT2:... that The Hamilton Crowne Plaza features 1920s Art Deco elements, however includes modern features?
Comment: ALT2 is the more appropiate hook. If there are any issues, feel free to leave a talkback template at my talk.
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Pengejar Angin

Created/expanded by Thine Antique Pen (talk). Self nom at 20:02, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Good to go, although it is a tad too much of a travel guide type article, could use more solid sources and information..♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:52, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your review! ⇒T A P 09:34, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Hook fact about "Art Deco" is not supported by the inline citation; since that's key to all three proposed hooks, none can be substituted in the prepare area, so the hook is being pulled back. The use of citations is a bit odd: number 4, used in the second Information paragraph, and is supposed to support the Starbucks in sentence two and the 1920s in sentence four (the "arched glass" in sentence five might be supported by the photo), doesn't mention any of these on the page that comes up when I click on the reference URL. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:56, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Seems I missed out a ref. ⇒T A P 16:25, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

No new hooks proposed after one week, nor action taken on citations problems. In addition, references are entirely from commercial or primary sources; no independent secondary sources indicating notablity. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:18, 8 July 2012 (UTC)