Template:Did you know nominations/The Gladstone Arms

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 12:00, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

The Gladstone Arms

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

The Gladstone Arms, known as "The Glad"

• ... that an MP crawled to save The Glad (pictured)?

• Reviewed: Priddy Meeks
• Comment: Created at the Liberal history editathon. I plan to visit the place and so may be able to take some better photos.

Created by Andrew Davidson (talk) and Edwardx (talk). Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk) at 12:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC).

 • Some issues found.

• • ✓ This article is new and was created on 12:08, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 1845 characters
  • ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
  • ✗ This article has the following issues:
    • {{London-struct-stub}} from creation
    • {{pub-stub}} from creation
  • ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (4.8% confidence; confirm)
    • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

 • No overall issues detected

• • ✓ The media File:The Glad.jpg is free-use
  • ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 41 characters
  • ✓ Andrew Davidson has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Priddy Meeks was performed for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 16:10, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

• I have removed the stub templates. Andrew D. (talk) 18:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

• This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline, but are more understandable if the image is used. The image is a bit dark but is appropriately licensed. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:17, 31 August 2016 (UTC)