Template:Did you know nominations/The Discipline of Market Leaders
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 21:01, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Discipline of Market Leaders
[edit]- ... that the authors of "The Discipline of Market Leaders" were accused of purchasing thousands of copies of their own book, in order to get the book on The New York Times Best Seller list?
- Reviewed: So Damn Beautiful (Poloroid song)
Created by Freikorp (talk). Self nominated at 06:25, 10 May 2013 (UTC).
Date, size, refs, hook all in order (the refs seem reliable enough to justify the controversial hook, which otherwise seems neutral).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:57, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)
Good article, long enough, brand new, hook is verified, no other issues; except few minor. It says "book debuted on The New York Times Best Seller list". The category "non-fiction" is obvious, but it should be mentioned. Also the Content section is very small. For a 224 pages book i am sure they discuss more. Please add more to it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry Piotrus! I am just being a bit strict. But i seriously wasn't much content with those two lines in Content. It kinda looks incomplete. Hence this comment. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:22, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- I have addressed both of Dharmadhyaksha's concerns. Please review again. Freikorp (talk) 12:16, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- Good to go! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 15:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- I have addressed both of Dharmadhyaksha's concerns. Please review again. Freikorp (talk) 12:16, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry Piotrus! I am just being a bit strict. But i seriously wasn't much content with those two lines in Content. It kinda looks incomplete. Hence this comment. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:22, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
