Template:Did you know nominations/Teri Ore

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Launchballer talk 08:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Teri Ore

(

)

... that the 2008 Hindi-language song "Teri Ore" was shot in six hours in Egypt with Katrina Kaif changing?

Source: https://www.mid-day.com/entertainment/bollywood-news/article/katrina-kaif-and-akshay-kumars-teri-ore-was-shot-in-6-hours-reveals-bosco-martis-23245341

Reviewed:

Created by KunalAggarwal95 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 09:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC).

I'll review this. RoySmith (talk) 18:13, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Long enough
New enough
Earwig is over-quota on searches, but no problems seen when run in links-only mode.
I don't see any problems with NPOV, BLP, etc.
The sources range from high-quality to meh (random entertainment industry websites) but nothing that sets off alarm bells.
Nom is QPQ-exempt.
The hook fact is in the article and cited. That being said, I don't know what "changing" means in this context
I don't know anything about how music videos are shot, but having it done in 6 hours does seem interesting.
approved, with the one proviso that maybe the word "changing" needs to be clarified in the hook. RoySmith (talk) 18:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- "changing dress"? KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 06:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  - @KunalAggarwal95 and RoySmith: as of now, I'm not seeing that the sources in the article establish notability under WP:GNG or WP:NSONG. Do reliable, secondary sources that provide significant coverage of the topic exist? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 06:44, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
    - @Theleekycauldron: The song meets the notability. I don't understand what more work the article needs. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 09:40, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
      - @KunalAggarwal95: I'm not sure it does. The first source is a track listing, the next three are listicles, the next one is an interview, the next three are album reviews, the next two are awards, and only the last one could arguably count as significant coverage of substantial impact. That means you only have one source that meets the requirements spelled out in WP:GNG – you'd need one or two more to meet notability requirements. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
        @Theleekycauldron: Waiting for your reply and about the notability tag. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 07:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
        @KunalAggarwal95: the most recent source you've provided does not give significant coverage to the topic, unfortunately. RoySmith, any thoughts? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 15:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
        I'm probably the wrong person to ask about this. As far as I'm concerned, the vast majority of our music articles don't meet WP:N, but I recognize I'm not going to convince people of that, so I just grit my teeth and move on. RoySmith (talk) 15:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
        Do as you wish. KunalAggarwal95 (talk) 07:47, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

@Theleekycauldron: If you do not think this meets the notability requirements, can you open an AfD so we can get consensus on this nomination? If you think it meets the requirements, can you remove the banner and indicate below? Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 23:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

@KunalAggarwal95, RoySmith, and Z1720: yeah, I've brought it to AfD. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 09:25, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Reiterating icon, which remains in effect until the AfD has concluded. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:09, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

This article was deleted at AfD, therefore the nomination fails.--Laun chba ller 08:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)