Template:Did you know nominations/Teladorsagia circumcincta
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:51, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Teladorsagia circumcincta
[edit]... that the parasitic nematode Teladorsagia circumcincta predominantly infects sheep that are protein-deficient?Source: Donaldson et al. 1998, Stear et al. 2003
- Comment: Just published by the WikiJournal of Science [1], and turned from a stub into a peer-reviewed article (note that Evolution and evolvability did not create the text; they just updated it from the published article, as the journal's Editor).
5x expanded by Evolution and evolvability (talk). Nominated by Elmidae (talk) at 00:35, 26 April 2019 (UTC).
- Major recent expansion, no copyvio detected, large enough
Quetzal1964 (talk) 12:15, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
@Elmidae and Evolution and evolvability: The proposed hook gives the impression that protein deficiency is a prerequisite for heavy infections whereas my reading of the article is that protein deficiency is a result of heavy infections. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:49, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- That's a good point; my phrasing is actually quite misleading there. Let me propose two alternatives:
- ALT1... that sheep infected with the parasitic nematode Teladorsagia circumcincta will suffer from protein deficiency? Source: Donaldson et al. 1998, Stear et al. 2003
- - or, based on a less important but more hooky facet:
- ALT2... that sheep infected with the parasitic nematode Teladorsagia circumcincta have been treated with fungal spores? Source: Waller et al. 2004
- --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:09, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- I have numbered your new hooks ALT1 and ALT2 and added the word "spores" to the article. Let's ask @Quetzal1964: to give a tick if these hooks are acceptable. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:35, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- That's a good point; my phrasing is actually quite misleading there. Let me propose two alternatives:
- Major recent expansion, no copyvio detected, large enough
Mike Stear: in relation to ALT1 I think it is more accurate to say that "... sheep infected with the parasitic nematode Teladorsagia circumcincta may suffer from protein deficiency". In relation to ALT2 I think that it is better to say "... sheep infected with the parasitic nematode Teladorsagia circumcincta can be given fungal spores which will develop in the faeces, kill developing larvae and reduce the transmission of parasites between sheep. - MStear (talk contribs) 17:06, 20 June 2019
- Re the latter, I think that may be too long for a hook. While the shorter phrasing is of course not as detailed as it could be, I don't think it's factually wrong? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:40, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
@Quetzal1964: - have you missed the updates since May...? starship.paint (talk) 03:32, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- Apologies folks, I think this is good to go.Quetzal1964 (talk) 06:36, 3 August 2019 (UTC)