Template:Did you know nominations/Taynal

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 11:33, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Taynal

(

)

... that in 1332 Taynal, the Mamluk governor of Tripoli, was transferred to Gaza as punishment by the viceroy of Syria, only to be reassigned to Tripoli three years later?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Prince Rupert's cube

Created/expanded by Al Ameer son (talk). Self nom at 20:16, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

New enough, long enough, neutral, supported by sources but no copyvio, hook supported by source. Good to go. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:49, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Article does not give the 1332 year for the transfer to Gaza, nor the period of time there; it does say that he regained the Tripoli post in 1335. Either article or hook must be adjusted so the two agree, and the hook is properly sourced. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:04, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

I put the 1332 date into the article - it is given in the source - so the hook is now consistent. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry to be a stickler—I really wanted to promote the article now!—but DYK requires that each hook fact have an inline citation by the end of the sentence that it's in. I strong suspect it's the same one at the end of the sentence after that, but have no way to check. Could you please add it in? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- Done. --Al Ameer son (talk) 04:15, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! Removing my earlier "?" icon so your approval regains force. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

QPQ review, please? --PFHLai (talk) 23:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Just addressed QPQ review (see above). --Al Ameer son (talk) 06:42, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Now that QPQ review has been completed, reinstating earlier approval based on Aymatth2's review (and my subsequent requests that were fixed). BlueMoonset (talk) 06:51, 3 September 2012 (UTC)