Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Tawny-breasted myiobius

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 19:54, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Tawny-breasted myiobius, Black-tailed myiobius, Whiskered myiobius

[edit]
Black-tailed myiobius
Black-tailed myiobius

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC).

  • Three articles so I will do three separate DYK assessments below. I will note that QPQ is done for all three. More to come  MPJ-DK  01:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Image checks out license wise so that is acceptable.
Tawny-breasted myiobius
  • Barely long enough but does qualify. Sourced in general, well written. No link issues, no copyright or close paraphrase issues
  • Sourced that it's found in South American rainforests, although the claim that its habitat differs from the other birds is not mentioned at all? Red XN
Black-tailed myiobius
  • Just past the 5 time expansion. Sourced in general, well written in general. No copyright violation
  • The tool indicates a time out for the cornell.edu link
  • Sourced that it's found in South American rainforests, although the claim that its habitat differs from the other birds is not mentioned at all? Red XN
Whiskered myiobius
  • Expanded enough. well written. Sourced in general as well as the hook specifically. No copyright violations or close paraphrase issues. Links look good. This checks out
  • Yes the hook is there and sourced, I think this information needs to be in all three articles. Green tickY
  • - The hook needs to be added to the first two articles. It's in the third and sources so it's not that much of a challenge to address that Cwmhiraeth. On hold until it's been addressed.  MPJ-DK  02:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
@MPJ-DK: I have made some alterations so perhaps you could indicate whether they are sufficient. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:20, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • - Cwmhiraeth, sources looks to go me, so I can approve this one.  MPJ-DK  20:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC)