Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Tata Jagriti Yatra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to promote after 17 days. The concerns raised by Orlady (talk · contribs) regarding the article's reading like an advertisement and the hook's being uncited have not been addressed. Cunard (talk) 23:34, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Tata Jagriti Yatra

[edit]

Created/expanded by BabyPoochies (talk). Self nom at 12:39, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Hook review
Format Citation Neutrality Interest


Article review
Length Newness Adequate
citations
Formatted
citations
Reliable
sources
Neutrality Plagiarism
♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email
Since the ALT hook was proposed by me, i will wait for someone else to review the hook. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 15:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
No hook, thus it fails the WP:WIADYK. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 14:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Changed my review. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:07, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi... Could you please elaborate on the problem in my article? I did not quite get what the issue was.. :( BabyPoochies (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

There is no problem with the article, but you need to put a fact from it so we can put in on the Did you know? section. However I have put one know. So there are no issues now. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 15:27, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you so much! :) BabyPoochies (talk) 16:03, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Good to go. Needs someone to review the hook. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:04, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Article seems excessively advert-like and hook fact is not supported by a citation in the article. --Orlady (talk) 18:44, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Article untouched in 7 days. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:12, 15 October 2011 (UTC)