Template:Did you know nominations/Tanks in the Australian Army
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rcsprinter123 (warn) @ 19:39, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Tanks in the Australian Army
[edit]
- ... that the 6th Division Cavalry Regiment's use of tanks during the capture of Tobruk in 1941 was the first time that Australian forces used tanks (pictured) in action?
- Reviewed: Not a self-nomination
Improved to Good Article status by Anotherclown (talk). Nominated by Oceanh (talk) at 22:35, 31 July 2014 (UTC).
- No, it wasn't. Australian forces used tanks in action during the Great War, but they were manned by the British. Can we come up with another hook? Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- How about something along the lines of:
- ALT 1... that Australian forces used captured Italian tanks (pictured) during the capture of Tobruk in 1941?
Manxruler (talk) 11:35, 2 August 2014 (UTC)- The issue I think is with the word "used". It is true that Australian infantry had worked alongside British tanks in World War I so this word is a little unclear I agree. I think "operated" might more accurately describe the situation, as it was the first time an Australian Army unit had operated tanks in action. As such I propose:
- ALT 2: ... that the 6th Division Cavalry Regiment's use of tanks during the capture of Tobruk in 1941 was the first time that Australian forces operated tanks (pictured) in action? Anotherclown (talk) 22:43, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- The issue I think is with the word "used". It is true that Australian infantry had worked alongside British tanks in World War I so this word is a little unclear I agree. I think "operated" might more accurately describe the situation, as it was the first time an Australian Army unit had operated tanks in action. As such I propose:
