Template:Did you know nominations/Tan Tjoen Tiat
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:50, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Tan Tjoen Tiat
[edit]- ... that the Chinese-Indonesian bureaucrat Tan Tjoen Tiat, second Majoor der Chinezen of Batavia, advised the colonial government in 1870 that women should not act as guardians for minors? Source: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=KwEtDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA822&dq=tan+tjoen+tiat&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjlxarh7sbdAhWJQo8KHYYtBREQ6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q=tan%20tjoen%20tiat&f=false
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Created by FKSuprapto (talk). Self-nominated at 10:34, 19 September 2018 (UTC).
- New enough, nominated on time. I have taken the liberty of moving the nomination to the date the article was created (September 16, 2018), not when it was nominated (September 18, 2018). It's long enough, neutral, cited (the list of "Titles and styles" can be considered a restatement of info in the body of the text which is cited and therefore accepted), no copyright violations (0% on Earwig's Copyvio Detector.) The hook is supported by facts which are appropriately cited. @FKSuprapto: the QPQ checker doesn't seem to think you've done any DYKs previously. Is this correct? If so, no OPQ is required. No images involved. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 19:17, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Mary Mark Ockerbloom Indeed, it is! More to come, hopefully FKSuprapto (talk) 14:37, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- All requirements met. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 14:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- New enough, nominated on time. I have taken the liberty of moving the nomination to the date the article was created (September 16, 2018), not when it was nominated (September 18, 2018). It's long enough, neutral, cited (the list of "Titles and styles" can be considered a restatement of info in the body of the text which is cited and therefore accepted), no copyright violations (0% on Earwig's Copyvio Detector.) The hook is supported by facts which are appropriately cited. @FKSuprapto: the QPQ checker doesn't seem to think you've done any DYKs previously. Is this correct? If so, no OPQ is required. No images involved. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 19:17, 19 September 2018 (UTC)